Skip to content

Conversation

@boyum
Copy link
Contributor

@boyum boyum commented Oct 27, 2024

The current links reference moved markdown files in the typescript-eslint repo.

@graphite-app
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Oct 27, 2024

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into main

Add the label “Status: Merge Queue” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “Status: Hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix.

You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

@boyum boyum changed the title docs: update @typescript-eslint links docs: update typescript-eslint links Oct 27, 2024
@RebeccaStevens RebeccaStevens added the Status: Merge Queue Merge the stack with the merge queue label Oct 27, 2024
@RebeccaStevens
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.13%. Comparing base (4a8b02c) to head (656186b).
Report is 175 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (4a8b02c) and HEAD (656186b). Click for more details.

HEAD has 2 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (4a8b02c) HEAD (656186b)
next 1 0
4.3.5 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #892       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   99.34%   89.13%   -10.22%     
===========================================
  Files          46       51        +5     
  Lines        6760     4913     -1847     
  Branches      464      693      +229     
===========================================
- Hits         6716     4379     -2337     
- Misses         43      523      +480     
- Partials        1       11       +10     
Flag Coverage Δ
4.3.5 ?
latest 89.13% <ø> (-9.59%) ⬇️
next ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

RebeccaStevens commented Oct 27, 2024

Merge activity

  • Oct 27, 9:12 AM EDT: The merge label 'Status: Merge Queue' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
  • Oct 27, 9:12 AM EDT: A user added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Oct 27, 9:12 AM EDT: The Graphite merge queue couldn't merge this PR because it failed for an unknown reason (Stack merges are not currently supported for forked repositories. Please create a branch in the target repository in order to merge).
  • Nov 1, 12:39 AM EDT: The merge label 'Status: Merge Queue' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
  • Nov 1, 12:39 AM EDT: A user added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Nov 1, 12:40 AM EDT: The Graphite merge queue couldn't merge this PR because it failed for an unknown reason (Stack merges are not currently supported for forked repositories. Please create a branch in the target repository in order to merge).

@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the Status: Merge Queue Merge the stack with the merge queue label Oct 27, 2024
@RebeccaStevens RebeccaStevens added the Status: Merge Queue Merge the stack with the merge queue label Nov 1, 2024
@RebeccaStevens RebeccaStevens merged commit 5b954ce into eslint-functional:main Nov 1, 2024
16 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the Status: Merge Queue Merge the stack with the merge queue label Nov 1, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 7.2.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Status: Released It's now live. label Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Status: Released It's now live.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants